United Guild Alliance

Each guild can submit 1 vote.
The vote will be the responsibility of the leaders of the guild in question.
Every guild member has the right to vote. After every member of one of the guilds vote, the majority will be taken.
There will be a deadline so any guild member who doesn't meet the deadline will not be able to vote.

A threat to any of our allies is a threat to the UGA. However, if a member of the UGA is accused of a wrong doing and given the sufficient proof is provided, a vote can be held whether or not to take the responding threat seriously. To add to that, if the allied guild happens to commit an act so heinous that drastic actions have to be taken, they can be kicked.

If a non-UGA guild attacks any UGA guild, the entire UGA is expected to be wary of the offending guild and, if possible, back up their allies.

A UGA guild cannot declare war on another UGA guild, they will have to request a kick first. Remember, this is an alliance. We have to respect each others viewpoints, it won't be an alliance if there is war amidst our members.

UGA guilds are not held responsible for what their members do unless it is a recurring act.
However, it is also the responsibility of the offending guild to punish the offending party of members and/or pay the damaged guild its recompensation(which should be coming out of the offenders pocket). If the offending guild refuses to pay recompensation/punish offenders then they have no place in the alliance. Trust is a major factor in the alliance.

The managing guild CAN be kicked. This is to combat any form of tyranny that might arise.

If any UGA guild is having issues, then UGA guilds are expected to help. Note the usage of the word 'expected', if you ever get in a tight spot and need help, you should try to help others when they are in a tight spot.

A guild dedicated to killing for no purpose will not be allowed to join the UGA. A perfect example is ROOM. Red guilds with a purpose of greater good are allowed to join. The term 'greater purpose' is decided by the current guild leaders as they vote for entering guilds.
More to come

A threat to any of our allies is a threat to the UGA.
This is a bit awkward. If an enemy team is threatening an ally who did a wrongdoing, what would happen then?
If a member of the UGA is accused of a wrong doing and given the sufficient proof is provided, a vote can be held whether or not to take that threat seriously(I should have added that in). To add to that, if the allied guild happens to commit an act so heinous that drastic actions have to be taken, they can always be kicked.

If a non-UGA guild attacks any UGA guild, the entire UGA is obligated to declare war on them until surrender.
Guilds who don't want to partake in the matter and or do not have the materials should be fully obligated to not fight whatsoever. Declaring war until surrender is also a bit brutish, and could lead to the mass destruction of many guilds in the front lines.
I wholeheartedly agree with this discrepancy and will be fixed. However, all guilds should be wary of the offending guild and should limit contact unless it will hamper the productivity of said guild.

A UGA guild cannot declare war on another UGA guild, they will have to request a kick first.
I find snooping into 2 guilds problems quite annoying, if they have a problem, let them resolve it. Also, who knows how long it will take for a kick request to go through? If two guilds want to go to war, work it out and let them say publicly they have internal problems.
..... An alliance is a truce with benefits..... You cannot have a truce with benefits if you are at discord with each other. All this is saying is that Alliance members have to respect another because it won't be an ALLIANCE to begin with.

UGA guilds are not held responsible for what their members do unless it is a recurring act. If so, then a kick request should be sent to the managing guild.
This contradicts the threat to UGA statement. If someone in a guild makes a mini-guild to attack the larger guild, apparently it isn't your problem, when you clearly stated it is.
Well, it is said guilds responsibility to punish said party and/or pay the damaged guild its recompensation(which should be coming out of the offenders pocket). If the offending guild refuses to pay recompensation/punish offenders then they have no place in the alliance. Trust is a major factor in the alliance.

The managing guild CAN be kicked.
UGA should have a courtroom of some sort to work this out. If the UGA itself has a problem with the guild, and all other guilds don't, what would happen? Massive chaos is what. Kicking instantly is rude and you should consult the guild and other guilds or, at least, close guilds before doing so.
This is the plan, but as of now there are too few guilds to have that issue and there is no idea of how the game will manage the guild system. All we can do for now is hold a conversation between ALL of the guild leaders and hope for the best :/

If any UGA guild is having issues, then UGA guilds are expected to help.
I'm just going to copy and paste here. Guilds who don't want to partake in the matter and or do not have the materials should be fully obligated to not fight whatsoever. This puts massive stress and constant work on UGA guilds. If one guild has a problem, everyone has a problem. It should be revised to say "If you want to help, help!" Forcefully putting pressure on guilds who don't have the people isn't right.
I placed the word 'expected' there to hint that you are not required. I should put emphasis on this. Thanks!

A guild dedicated to killing for no purpose will not be allowed to join the UGA. A perfect example is ROOM. Red guilds with a purpose of greater good are allowed to join.
Who decides whether it is good or not? I was thinking of creating a sub-group of Red/Yellow players who are paid assassins who only take requests of heinous players, and I would decide and do heavy research to give permissions to let them do it. If I join the UGA, would they go under me, or you? Also, would you do the research? Who would decide if they can or not?
Well... The current guild leaders decide. As explained by the voting section, any guild that the current guild leaders have concerns about can be voted for a kick. The ones pushing for the kick can explain exactly why they are doing so as to convince people what the offending guild is doing is wrong. It is up to the guild leaders, EVERY guild leader (unless they are not present at the time) to kick them out.
This also applies to any guild wanting to gain entry to the UGA. As of right now, no guild can be kicked out until the 13 guild mark has been reached, I feel like 13 is a good number to start being vigilant about what we do.